| Math 323 |
Project IV
Even, Odd, and Cool |
Spring 2008 |
Due 4:14 PM, Friday, March 28.
Final solution should be typed. No rough draft required.
NOT A GROUP PROJECT; each student should turn in a paper. |
Part I. (Click on the link
for Part I; updated March 8, 8:45 AM; slight correction in
Problem 2c, March 24, 7:45 PM.)
Part II.
(See additional Notes.) Do the
problems below.
We consider functions from a vector space V to the set
of real numbers. (Do not get hung up on the fact that the domain is
a vector space. If this causes you any trouble, you will lose only a few
points if you assume that the domain is the set of real numbers.)
The product, fg, of two such functions
f and g is defined in the way that a
product of functions is usually defined in algebra and calculus. If
f is such a function, we say that the function
f is
- even iff, for every x in
V, f(-x) = f(x).
- odd iff, for every x in
V, f(-x) =
-f(x).
- cool iff it is both even and odd.
Comment: The concepts of “even” and
“odd” functions are standard and should be familiar. The
concept of “cool” functions is specific for this Project, and
this is not standard terminology.
- Let V be a given nonzero vector space. Prove or
disprove each of the following statements (give complete, careful
proofs, using the standard method for proving universally quantified
statements; see Part I):
- The product of two* even functions is even.
- The product of two* odd functions is odd.
- The product of two* cool functions is cool.
*We use the word “two” in the sense usually used in mathematics
in similar contexts: We do not assume that the “two” functions
are distinct; the two functions may be different or be the same.
Note on counterexamples: If you need a counterexample, be sure to
read the fine print at the beginning. It is great if you can find a
counterexample for a general vector space. It is good if you can find a
counterexample for a general inner product space. (An “inner product
space” is a vector space with an inner product defined on it; an
“inner product” is sometimes called a “scalar
product”, and it is a generalization of the “dot product”
from vector calculus.) It is sufficient if you can find a counterexample
for the set of real numbers.
- Listed are two typical incorrect solutions of Exercise 6.27(h).
Explain the relation** between
- Ex. 6.27(h) and the “reasoning” used in these incorrect
solutions, and
- the result of the problem above on even, odd, and cool
functions.
You are supposed to explain the relation** between (a) and (b). In other
words, you are to explain how the problem above on even, odd, and cool
functions is relevant to the errors listed below which were made in the
solutions of Exercise 6.27(h).
(Hint: “Cool function” means “even and odd
function”. “Equivalence relation” means “reflexive,
symmetric, and transitive relation”.)
Incorrect solutions of 6.27(h).
- Let R and S be equivalence
relations. Then R and S are
transitive. We know from Exercise 6.27(f) that
R ∪ S *** is not
transitive. Thus,
R ∪ S *** is not an
equivalence relation.
- Let R and S be equivalence
relations. Then R and S are
transitive. We know from Exercise 6.27(f) that
R ∪ S *** is not
necessarily transitive. Thus,
R ∪ S *** is not
necessarily an equivalence relation.
**The word “relation” here is used in the ordinary English
sense of the word, not in the mathematical sense of a set of ordered
pairs.
***In case these symbols do not show up properly in your browser,
“ R ∪ S ” is
“ R union S ”.
Last modified Mar 24, 2008 7:43 PM
Return to the Course Home
Page.