The study of solidification has a long and diverse history, and is of key importance in every branch of materials science. The main champions of the field have been the metallurgists, and before them, the ceramists. With the development of new technologies, new fields have arisen, in which solidification once again plays a primary role, such as semiconductor/electronic materials and polymer science, as well as the pharmaceutical and food industries. In all of these fields, the use of model systems is necessary to facilitate the fundamental study of solidification processes. One rather popular model system for such studies is that of Ammonium Choloride ($NH_4Cl$) in water\footnote{The crystallization in the $NH_4Cl-H_2O$ system is quite similar to that of austenitic steel \cite{Saratovkin:59} and is therefore of use to the metals industry. In addition to this system, there are a number of other very good model systems (including several organic systems such as the succinonitrile-acetone system), which are the systems of choice for studying metals.}, in which the solid $NH_4Cl$ precipitates out of its aqueous solution. This system has been popular because the materials are readily available and the experiments are more easily performed and observed than in most other systems. The crystallization, in addition to being beautiful to watch, is quite fascinating. The spectrum of morphologies/patterns and the dynamics giving rise to them are so diverse that one can quite easily believe oneself to be a pioneer exploring an undiscovered wonderland. This has resulted in such unfortunate recent titles in the literature as ``New Periodic Morphologies...'' \cite{Raz:91} and ``New Experimental Findings...'' \cite{Honjo:85} for studies which had been more carefully performed in works published decades earlier. The three most exacting studies found on the $NH_4Cl-H_2O$ system are\footnote{The listed studies work with an approximately two-dimensional chamber geometry, which is explained in section Experimental Apparatus. Some excellent studies have been performed with fully three-dimensional geometries \cite{Jackson:66, Chen:91, Copley:70}. However, with such geometries, much of the behaviour of interest in this dissertation is not observed.}: \begin{itemize} \item P. P. Ewald's and A. Papapetrou's work culminating in Papapetrou's doctoral dissertation in ``general science'' in 1935 \cite{Papapetrou:35}; \item D. D. Saratovkin's beautiful exposition, translated into English in 1959\footnote{The translation is of the second edition, which was presumable written in 1954, judging by the dates of the cited publications.}, also serving as a full and critical bibliographic record of Russian work in metallurgy and solidification \cite{Saratovkin:59}; \item Manfred Kahlweit's and Hans-Hermann Reimer's (as well as others) work culminating in Reimer's Doctoral dissertation in physical chemistry in 1974 \cite{Reimer:74}. \end{itemize} As evidence of the general applicability of such research, the above three works alone span three different fields. Mechanical engineers, among others, are also working on this system in order to study the gravity-driven convection occuring in three-dimensional systems. Yet more recently, the development of powerful theories to understand pattern formation from a unified perspective has attracted a large number of physicists and applied mathematicians to the $NH_4Cl-H_2O$ system. Among these different fields, there is no uniformity in language or terminology. As a result, any special terms used in this work will be explicitly defined. More detailed treatments are available in any of the good introductory texts. One noteworthy example is the text of Wilfred Kurz and D. Fisher \cite{Kurz:92} which is accessible on many levels. In addition to this, \cite{Kingery:76} and \cite{Jones:84} are quite encompassing, while \cite{Rogers:51} and \cite{Smith:51} serve as very clear introductions written in layman's terms.